News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Craig Wright Is Not Satoshi Nakamoto by maxander on Monday May 02, 2016 @08:27PM (#11616924)
If Satoshi were watching and cared, all he'd (she'd) have to do is send an appropriately-signed text via Tor or whatever saying Craig is a liar. Coming forward in any substantial sense would be unnecessary.

That Craig is proceeding with this big hoax regardless means either that A) he knows who Satoshi is, and knows that Satoshi is cooperating/dead/apathetic/etc, or B) he's looking for sufficiently short-term gain that there's low enough risk that Satoshi would intervene in time.

Re:Craig Wright Is Not Satoshi Nakamoto by dllthomas on Monday May 02, 2016 @09:20PM (#11617146)
Watching, cared, and still had access to those keys.
Re:Craig Wright Is Not Satoshi Nakamoto by maxander on Monday May 02, 2016 @11:35PM (#11617710)
I'd trust the brilliant mind behind Bitcoin to hold onto some backups of keys worth half a billion dollars. Since you never know, such a a thing could come in handy someday.
Re:Craig Wright Is Not Satoshi Nakamoto by ownagefool on Tuesday May 03, 2016 @02:45AM (#11618448)
I wouldn't, you can be a genuis and still be lazy about backing up and rotating your super private personal key.

Alternativly, he could be altruistic and deleted the Statoshi key to protect against manipulation, including from his future self.

Re:Craig Wright Is Not Satoshi Nakamoto by dllthomas on Monday May 02, 2016 @11:47PM (#11617756)
There were many years where the keys guarded bitcoins worth approximately zero.

And shit happens, even to geniuses sometimes.