News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Scientists discover potentially habitable planets by hanniabu on Monday May 02, 2016 @06:39PM (#11616322)
If we're going to make it to another planet that far away, we're going to either need to put our astronauts in some type of suspended state or be able to give birth and raise children on ships.

I wonder what the effects would be of a child forming in a womb, being born, and growing up in zero gravity conditions.

Re:Scientists discover potentially habitable planets by s_q_b on Monday May 02, 2016 @07:03PM (#11616459)
Build a 1g spinning section, if that's what's needed for a generational ship. Such "slowboats" are going to need to be:

1. Incredibly expensive.

2. Massive beyond the scale of anything ever assembled in orbit.

3. Big enough to carry a self-sustaining colony, above minimum population size for genetic issues.

So, newborns in zero-g, not necessarily needed, if we're really going to the stars the old fashioned way.

Re:Scientists discover potentially habitable planets by siquick on Monday May 02, 2016 @07:42PM (#11616728)
Is #2 because we don't have rockets powerful enough to launch these ships into space?
Re:Scientists discover potentially habitable planets by Retric on Monday May 02, 2016 @09:25PM (#11617165)
Anything we send up to LEO now is 1,000$+ per pound just from getting there. Now picture something large enough for X people plus their decedents to live in for 10,000 years including redundancy's and manufacturing base and you get some idea how much this would cost as a baseline right now. Now, we need to add however much fuel it takes to get it moving and slow down at the other end. 100% world GDP for Y years is the kind of figure's you end up with.

However, if we start building stuff from raw materials found in space these costs should drop dramatically. Honestly, we are looking at hundreds of years either way so it's sort of meaningless with our current lifespan.

Re:Scientists discover potentially habitable planets by s_q_b on Monday May 02, 2016 @08:58PM (#11617054)
Well, really all three are due to insufficient launch capbility. We'll have to assemble the colony ship in orbit.

Really, we need to build the Orion nuclear pulse ship for heavy lift and intra-stellar transport.

Without a reworking of modern physics, the Alcubierre Drive for example, transport is going to take a loooong time.

Even if we didn't need a backup planet, this is the next phase is human exploration. It's inherently part of human nature to expand our prescense.

Re:Scientists discover potentially habitable planets by perilunar on Monday May 02, 2016 @09:03PM (#11617083)
The won't be launched from earth or assembled in orbit from parts launched from earth - they'll be built from materials mined from asteroids
Re:Scientists discover potentially habitable planets by s_q_b on Friday May 06, 2016 @07:54PM (#11647574)
I wonder where the optimal location is to construct the first ship yard. Vesta, maybe?
Re:Scientists discover potentially habitable planets by SEJeff on Monday May 02, 2016 @06:41PM (#11616332)
Very very early onset osteoporosis when they come back to somewhere with gravity?
Re:Scientists discover potentially habitable planets by prodmerc on Monday May 02, 2016 @10:22PM (#11617372)
Growing up in zero G? I'm afraid the problems would be substantial. Not being able to walk, improperly formed skeleton and organs, extremely weak immune system, and I'm guessing much more...
Re:Scientists discover potentially habitable planets by sokoloff on Tuesday May 03, 2016 @06:26AM (#11619316)
What's the zero-G impact on the immune system? (genuine question)
Re:Scientists discover potentially habitable planets by Turbots on Tuesday May 03, 2016 @06:12PM (#11624669)
Rotate the ship fast enough to mimic 1G gravity... Solved!