News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Craig Wright Is Not Satoshi Nakamoto by _7sdg on Monday May 02, 2016 @05:20PM (#11615748)
It is beyond me that anyone would actually try to fake such a significant identity. Does this man have any self-respect?
Re:Craig Wright Is Not Satoshi Nakamoto by mizzao on Monday May 02, 2016 @05:26PM (#11615800)
People don't have self respect in a lot of situations. For example: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/10/sports/julie-miller-ironma...
Re:Craig Wright Is Not Satoshi Nakamoto by danielweber on Monday May 02, 2016 @05:30PM (#11615822)
"and that the only thing she did wrong, besides winning too often, was to lose her timing chip in a couple of races."

Geeze.

Re:Craig Wright Is Not Satoshi Nakamoto by cpncrunch on Monday May 02, 2016 @05:32PM (#11615849)
It sounds like he might be a scam artist, so I guess the answer is no. If you're going to con the tax man out of millions of dollars, creating a fake identity probably isn't going to worry him too much.

But I'm wondering: what if he is a scam artist and he actually is Satoshi?

Re:Craig Wright Is Not Satoshi Nakamoto by EdHominem on Thursday May 05, 2016 @02:34PM (#11638648)
If I walk into the room and you see me, you'll (subconsciously) assign a zero-chance that I'm the queen on England. Why would that become non-zero when I present obviously faked proof (a paper crown, etc).

Why would CW's obviously faked evidence provide any support for his claims?