Re:WhatsApp, Used by 100M Brazilians, Shut Down Nationwide T...
by soapdog on Monday May 02, 2016 @04:29PM
(#11615285)
I completely agree with you. HDI is a much better index and measurement. This is actually what we use in social programs here.
The GDP comment I made is that this is not a "poor country", it is instead a country full of wealth inequality and self-perpetuating bad distribution of opportunities where poor people are being kept poor due to having no access to infrastructure and opportunities.
It is a very complex situation and all expressions such as "poor-3rd-world" or "seventh gdp economy" are all reductionist and shallow compared to what is really happening.
Re:WhatsApp, Used by 100M Brazilians, Shut Down Nationwide T...
by cplanas on Monday May 02, 2016 @07:00PM
(#11616434)
I agree with your comment, particularly with the fact that HDI is a good index for monitoring the "richness" of a country.
However, the parent comment was about Brazil being a 3rd world country, not only "poor" by US standards. There are 113 countries that score lower than Brazil: countries like Ukraine or China. I don't think they are the 3rd world.
HDI (Human Development Index) and GDP per capita are both much better measurements of how "rich" a country is than raw GDP. Brazil's HDI is 0.755, just below Mexico (0.756)[1]. That's good by global standards, but still "poor" by U.S. standards. Its GDP per capita (PPP adjusted, so being kind to Brazil) is $15,615. The U.S.'s is $55,805[2]
[1]: http://hdr.undp.org/en/composite/HDI
[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)...