Re:Can’t Hack a Hacker: Reverse Engineering a Discovered ATM...
by jrjarrett on Monday May 02, 2016 @08:41AM
(#11610844)
I'm in Madison, too, and there are still a lot of places that don't use the chips. I was at Farm & Fleet yesterday, had to swipe, for example.
Re:Can’t Hack a Hacker: Reverse Engineering a Discovered ATM...
by surge on Monday May 02, 2016 @10:41AM
(#11611728)
I've been told that card processors will get charged more going forward if they don't implement the chips, or for non-chip transactions because of the added risk involved. That should help speed up the transition or at least activate it on those readers that have it.
Re:Can’t Hack a Hacker: Reverse Engineering a Discovered ATM...
by throwaway7767 on Monday May 02, 2016 @12:25PM
(#11612834)
> I've been told that card processors will get charged more going forward if they don't implement the chips, or for non-chip transactions because of the added risk involved.
This is true. It's also weird, since really they should be charging less for chip-and-pin, not more for magstripes. By moving to chip-and-pin they immediately release themselves from the hook for card theft, moving the liability to the card holder. The high transaction costs in card networks have historically been defended as largely stemming from fraud costs. Yet, we're expected to pay the same fees.
It's a good time to be in the card processing business.
Re:Can’t Hack a Hacker: Reverse Engineering a Discovered ATM...
by SmirkingRevenge on Monday May 02, 2016 @12:23PM
(#11612823)
Where I live (NC) almost nobody has chips enabled, even big chains, the one exception being Target.
Re:Can’t Hack a Hacker: Reverse Engineering a Discovered ATM...
by nickpsecurity on Tuesday May 03, 2016 @12:06AM
(#11617841)
Nice, underhanded humor. The joke being on them was even better given they were the retail company famous for having best security. :)
I assumed it had rolled out across most of the US at this point since most of the smaller places had even implemented it.