News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on ES6, ES7, and beyond. Parent comment

Re:ES6, ES7, and beyond by pornel on Friday April 29, 2016 @08:39PM (#11599693)
.es sounds good to me.

Seems like a good fit for EcmaScript. It might even help finally renaming the language, so that tech recruiters confuse it with something else ;)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:ES6, ES7, and beyond by KMag on Saturday April 30, 2016 @12:52AM (#11600424)
> so that tech recruiters confuse it with something else

At least if a recruiter starts asking you about your Eczema experience, you can more easily determine that the screening process has gone off the rails.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:ES6, ES7, and beyond by inglor on Saturday April 30, 2016 @01:19PM (#11602542)
That would be incorrect though, there are other implementations of the ES specification that are not JavaScript (UnityScript for example).

Although it's a cute suggestion.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:ES6, ES7, and beyond by greggman on Saturday April 30, 2016 @02:03PM (#11602747)
WAT? UnityScript is not an implementation of ES AFAICT. It's entirely made up by Unity and has almost nothing in common with JavaScript/EMCAScript
[ Parent | on HN ]