News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Who's downloading pirated papers? Everyone by alphydan on Friday April 29, 2016 @07:41PM (#11599458)
Popularity plays a role. Here's a real life example: One of my quantum physics mentors submitted a paper to PRL (a high prestige physics journal) and it was rejected. Why? Because it came from a small, rather unknown university in Spain.

He was later admitted to Cambridge for a PhD and sent the exact same paper (same formatting, content, layout but different department/uni). It was immediately accepted. Does it necessarily mean that scientists in poorer countries are doing bad science? Or just that they didn't get their visa / couldn't leave their country / just want to stay there, etc.

The first filter most editors use is: "Do I know this research group? Are they part of the club? Have they published in top journals?". If not, it won't get read (unless it's a compelling and exciting title and abstract).

Re:Who's downloading pirated papers? Everyone by joshvm on Saturday April 30, 2016 @12:00PM (#11602200)
Phys Rev Lett isn't double blind?

Double blind doesn't always work, sometimes it's painfully obvious who the PI is, but it should stop stuff like this from happening.

Re:Who's downloading pirated papers? Everyone by alphydan on Sunday May 01, 2016 @02:18PM (#11607226)
I haven't published there in a while but I don't think so.

> We are no longer able to accede to requests from authors that we withhold their identities from the referees. Such "double-blind" reviewing has been discontinued. [0]

[0] https://journals.aps.org/prl/authors/editorial-policies-prac...