Re:Who's downloading pirated papers? Everyone
by joshvm on Saturday April 30, 2016 @12:00PM
(#11602200)
Phys Rev Lett isn't double blind?
Double blind doesn't always work, sometimes it's painfully obvious who the PI is, but it should stop stuff like this from happening.
Re:Who's downloading pirated papers? Everyone
by alphydan on Sunday May 01, 2016 @02:18PM
(#11607226)
I haven't published there in a while but I don't think so.
> We are no longer able to accede to requests from authors that we withhold their identities from the referees. Such "double-blind" reviewing has been discontinued. [0]
[0] https://journals.aps.org/prl/authors/editorial-policies-prac...
He was later admitted to Cambridge for a PhD and sent the exact same paper (same formatting, content, layout but different department/uni). It was immediately accepted. Does it necessarily mean that scientists in poorer countries are doing bad science? Or just that they didn't get their visa / couldn't leave their country / just want to stay there, etc.
The first filter most editors use is: "Do I know this research group? Are they part of the club? Have they published in top journals?". If not, it won't get read (unless it's a compelling and exciting title and abstract).