Re:Why is Amazon all of a sudden not re-investing all its pr...
by hinkley on Friday April 29, 2016 @02:09PM
(#11597563)
Everybody lives and dies by the numbers, long term consequences be damned.
Even developers do this, although most of us resent having to do it. You manage risk and tech debt by splitting high risk projects into many small pieces, and amortizing improvements across low-complexity features. The long and short lines are never more than an order of magnitude or so apart, even though it might take ten 'tasks' to equal one change that the customer will actually notice.
Re:Why is Amazon all of a sudden not re-investing all its pr...
by coredog64 on Friday April 29, 2016 @04:50PM
(#11598660)
When I was at OnSemi, we had multiple calls for mandatory vacation. Paid leave is a liability on the books, so by forcing employees to take it, they could make the numbers look better. The message from management each time was "We know we told you last time that it would never happen again, but..."
Re:Why is Amazon all of a sudden not re-investing all its pr...
by JoeAltmaier on Friday April 29, 2016 @04:58PM
(#11598711)
One old company I worked at shipped empty boxes to a customer to make the quarter come out right. Shipped the hardware the next week when it was ready.
Re:Why is Amazon all of a sudden not re-investing all its pr...
by dctoedt on Friday April 29, 2016 @06:25PM
(#11599156)
I assume everyone knows that's probably securities fraud (assuming it's a public company).
Re:Why is Amazon all of a sudden not re-investing all its pr...
by ChuckMcM on Friday April 29, 2016 @07:01PM
(#11599292)
Or bricks instead of disk drives ... http://www.nytimes.com/1989/09/13/business/fraud-is-cited-at...
Re:Why is Amazon all of a sudden not re-investing all its pr...
by hkmurakami on Friday April 29, 2016 @06:53PM
(#11599260)
There's a certain video game company that ships remakes on newer platforms to meet revenue numbers.
At NetApp there were other tools, service revenues, expenses, etc. One quarter the call went out for everyone to be sure they had expensed everything they had outstanding. Once the summer employee event shifted by a week. They would also do close the quarter incentive sales which could bring in just enough orders to keep it in line.
As far as I can tell this is something they teach in business school as part of your MBA training. It seems pretty universal. When things can't be managed that way, you get actual unexpected surprises, lay offs, or work furloughs, or perhaps you decide you aren't going to hire nearly as many next year so you trim all the contract staff.
Clearly people aren't as worried by over delivering as they are under delivering. As you can see from the Apple and Google earnings calls, a small miss negative can have an outsized impact on your stock price. But it is also important to not consistently have upside surprises as suddenly people start valuing the stock assuming an upside surprise.