Re:SpaceX undercut ULA rocket launch pricing by 40 percent: ...
by secfirstmd on Thursday April 28, 2016 @11:25PM
(#11593594)
I'm always curious how much of a "covert" budget for the next stealth or other projects, can be hidden in something as big as the F35 program.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:SpaceX undercut ULA rocket launch pricing by 40 percent: ...
by DigitalJack on Friday April 29, 2016 @02:35AM
(#11594108)
That's an interesting point. I could only hope that it is actually true, and that the F35 is more subterfuge than boondoggle.
Re:SpaceX undercut ULA rocket launch pricing by 40 percent: ...
by kuschku on Friday April 29, 2016 @03:58AM
(#11594349)
With the cost overrun of the F35 Project, though, one could probably finance a whole Stargate program, spaceships included.
Re:SpaceX undercut ULA rocket launch pricing by 40 percent: ...
by robbiemitchell on Friday April 29, 2016 @08:11AM
(#11595144)
Assuming there aren't similar cost overruns...
Re:SpaceX undercut ULA rocket launch pricing by 40 percent: ...
by Teever on Friday April 29, 2016 @03:20AM
(#11594243)
I've wondered the same. I'm quite curious when they'll unveil an unmanned F-35.
I also wonder just how much of the technology and the pace of development we're seeing from SpaceX hasn't originated from the military themselves.
Re:SpaceX undercut ULA rocket launch pricing by 40 percent: ...
by eggy on Friday April 29, 2016 @06:52AM
(#11594868)
You need a human, not to fly it right now, but somebody has to reboot the software in flight ;) [1]
[1] http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/03/f-35-radar-system-has-bug-that-requires-hard-reboot-in-flight/
Re:SpaceX undercut ULA rocket launch pricing by 40 percent: ...
by Gravityloss on Friday April 29, 2016 @04:55PM
(#11598691)
I've heard that would be illegal