Re:Email privacy bill unanimously passes U.S. House
by akiselev on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @09:23PM
(#11585979)
Endorsing a piece of legislature is very different than actually voting on it. There's a lot of political back and forth for every bill that passes and endorsement is just an early phase when the whips start gathering numbers for who supports a given bill vocally and officially. This will put pressure on the comittee to put the bill on the floor as soon as possible and with little modification.
Once it's slated for the floor vote, the whips and bill sponsors (even more involved than endorsement) will round up the rest of the votes including those who would have voted yes anyway, but couldn't endorse or sponsor for political reasons, and those who need to be convinced through favors and whatnot. Remember, senators are elected by all districts in a state so they have to be more careful politically.
Re:Email privacy bill unanimously passes U.S. House
by gohrt on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @08:42PM
(#11585833)
I don't think the other 75% have expressed an opinion -- the Senate bill has only been in committee so far, not voted on by the Senate.
More than a quarter of senators have endorsed similar legislation in the upper chamber to the House bill, including No. 2 Republican John Cornyn.
Are we supposed to see that as a positive? Because I read it as "Only a quarter of senators have endorsed similar legislation."