Re:The F-35’s Software Is So Buggy It Might Ground the Whole...
by kps on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @03:04PM
(#11583535)
Learning Ada is easier than learning to write reliable software. If language experience is the barrier to ‘programmer availability’, then management is Doing It Wrong.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The F-35’s Software Is So Buggy It Might Ground the Whole...
by alephnil on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @03:11PM
(#11583595)
Indeed. I included that quote precisely because it shows such a lack of perspective. To get programmers with experience in safety critical real time programming is much harder than learning Ada, and training them to learn safety critical programming is much harder than learning any relevant programming language. But apparently the availability of C++ programmers was what they considered important.
Re:The F-35’s Software Is So Buggy It Might Ground the Whole...
by kevin_thibedeau on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @09:30PM
(#11586009)
Defense contractors won't invest in training. The programmers they hired would be mostly contract workers themselves because the MIC is deathly afraid of having actual employees that could cut into profits. Hence why they've managed to step away from ADA because those skills aren't readily available in the contractor pool.
Re:The F-35’s Software Is So Buggy It Might Ground the Whole...
by tormeh on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @05:11PM
(#11584604)
You know, I think they need a language with a lower entry point, to make it easier to onboard developers. PHP should do the job nicely.
Please nobody tell them.
Re:The F-35’s Software Is So Buggy It Might Ground the Whole...
by kps on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @05:59PM
(#11584921)
Sounds reasonable. An F-35 is built to ‘move fast and break things’.
Re:The F-35’s Software Is So Buggy It Might Ground the Whole...
by wrong_variable on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @11:45PM
(#11586450)
Someone should email the bosses the agile manifesto.