Re:German nuclear plant infected with computer viruses, oper...
by reacweb on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @09:44AM
(#11580351)
I think the sentence "But it would pass the virus on to other devices that plugged into the charger." comes from the reporter, showing that he does not understand computers. It is plausible that malwares were copied without being executed.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:German nuclear plant infected with computer viruses, oper...
by eterm on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @09:54AM
(#11580422)
A virus is something that copies itself. If something is copying a virus, it is infected.
So the virus would have to infect both android and the cockpit to spread from phone to cockpit to phone.
Re:German nuclear plant infected with computer viruses, oper...
by tinco on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @10:20AM
(#11580626)
Not at all, that's like saying floppy disk viruses happened because both PCs and floppy disks were vulnerable. Just imagine the cockpit to be a floppy disk. You plug your phone in, and your infected phone puts a file in the cockpit. Then someone with a vulnerable phone plugs into the cockpit, reads the file and is infected.
Not saying that's how it happened, just that it's possible.
Re:German nuclear plant infected with computer viruses, oper...
by vetinari on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @11:12AM
(#11581091)
The hole in the argument is, why would the second phone read the file and execute it? We are waaaay past autorun.
Re:German nuclear plant infected with computer viruses, oper...
by tinco on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @11:21AM
(#11581175)
Why would the first phone read the file and execute it? ( this is an exercise for the reader, not an actual question )
Re:German nuclear plant infected with computer viruses, oper...
by seanp2k2 on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @10:58PM
(#11586319)
Sadly, we're not: http://www.windows10update.com/2015/05/windows-10-tutorials-...