News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How JPG Works by ashmud on Thursday April 28, 2016 @11:45AM (#11589708)
I think the article could have used a little more on chroma subsampling ("downsampling," per the article). A couple examples: It is basically an optional step (in the case of 4:4:4). And the visual impact on heavily saturated colors (looking at you, bright red).
Re:How JPG Works by wmu on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @12:25PM (#11581867)
Really good introduction, well written.
Re:How JPG Works by netsharc on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @12:50PM (#11582152)
Talks about a technology. Misspells its name.

Ctrl-F gives me 17 results for JPG, 3 results for JPEG.

Re:How JPG Works by perflexive on Thursday April 28, 2016 @02:22AM (#11586849)
As far as I'm concerned, they're interchangeable. I can't be the only one who thinks so.
Re:How JPG Works by err4nt on Thursday April 28, 2016 @09:35AM (#11588672)
JPEG is an acronym for “Joint Photographics Experts Group”. So I guess “JPEG” refers to a collection of humans. They specified an image format also called JPEG, which has been implemented as the JPEG file format, whose filename suffix is “.jpg”
Re:How JPG Works by perflexive on Saturday April 30, 2016 @02:52PM (#11603010)
What I'm saying is that at no point was I confused about what they were trying to communicate, so as far as I'm concerned it makes no difference outside of just being pedantic.