Re:SpiderOak Encryptr – Zero-Knowledge Password Syncing
by wyager on Tuesday April 26, 2016 @01:37PM
(#11573921)
Not that guy, but that's a ridiculously bloated set of requirements.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:SpiderOak Encryptr – Zero-Knowledge Password Syncing
by BinaryIdiot on Tuesday April 26, 2016 @01:59PM
(#11574131)
Almost all of those requirements are only for developing / testing the repository. That's not uncommon for most languages / projects.
Re:SpiderOak Encryptr – Zero-Knowledge Password Syncing
by Karunamon on Tuesday April 26, 2016 @01:41PM
(#11573952)
The language it's written in, the testing framework, and the support library that lets it target more platforms? That doesn't seem too bloated to me.
Re:SpiderOak Encryptr – Zero-Knowledge Password Syncing
by pritambaral on Tuesday April 26, 2016 @03:12PM
(#11574690)
> That doesn't seem too bloated to me.
For a security software? It may not be too bloated for a web app, but for a piece of security software it is absolutely bloated.
Note: I'm not talking from a utility point-of-view, that "C'mon, writing a security-related app doesn't have to use so much stuff".
I'm talking from a safety point-of-view, that "Security stuff should absolutely not have such a large code footprint".