News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Chernobyl's legacy 30 years on by Floegipoky on Tuesday April 26, 2016 @12:43PM (#11573405)
>> Design flaws led to a power surge, causing massive explosions which blew the top off reactor four

Anybody else catch this wildly inaccurate representation of what caused the explosions? While there certainly were design flaws, it's well-known that this disaster was a direct result of the recklessness of the reactor's operators. I have to wonder if this mischaracterization is an attempt to further scare the public about nuclear power.

Re:Chernobyl's legacy 30 years on by InclinedPlane on Tuesday April 26, 2016 @08:05PM (#11576867)
It's unconscionable for such a reactor design to have been made and put into service in the first place. The particular bungled test that caused the disaster was somewhat of an exceptional circumstance but the RBMK design was really just a ticking timebomb waiting to go off. If it wasn't that test it would have been something else, maybe it wouldn't have been as bad, but it would almost certainly have been at least Fukushima scale regardless.
Re:Chernobyl's legacy 30 years on by ekun on Tuesday April 26, 2016 @01:55PM (#11574098)
The whole article is written to scare the public about nuclear power.