Mosh: the mobile shell

Re:Mosh: the mobile shell by spdustin on Tuesday April 26, 2016 @12:09PM (#11573051)

I'll chime in and say: Support for IPv6. It's ... self evident? I think we've reached a point that it's okay to call out a network client that doesn't support it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Mosh: the mobile shell by chitta on Tuesday April 26, 2016 @02:59PM (#11574595)

I am not sure I understand. How is it self-evident? Is there a benefit over using mosh over IPv4? Performance, stability,anything else? Does it add anything to what mosh can do over IPv4. Is the benefit from the client end or the server end or in-between.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Mosh: the mobile shell by DanielDent on Tuesday April 26, 2016 @03:41PM (#11574943)

Well one benefit is that it works. Servers which don't have a v4 address are a thing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Mosh: the mobile shell by spdustin on Tuesday April 26, 2016 @04:15PM (#11575230)

Connecting to servers that aren't given an IPv4 address (because NAT sucks)?

[ Parent | on HN ]