Re:Interview with Scott Aaronson
by foldr on Tuesday April 26, 2016 @11:04AM
(#11572462)
I just don't see how. It seems like a fairly obvious point that the two systems would be indistinguishable from the outside.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
In that case, the pragmatists would say that the distinction isn't meaningful, that free will is a concept with no meaning, and end the debate there.
I don't think it's plausible to maintain that the question of whether or not we have free will is "meaningless". Any criterion of meaningfulness that derives that conclusion is probably faulty.