News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Los Angeles and the 'great American streetcar scandal' by rhino369 on Monday April 25, 2016 @01:29PM (#11565793)
>This is a fallacy - self-driving cars may reduce car ownership and may reduce traffic fatalities, but they could only reduce traffic if speeds were extraordinarily high.

That's not true at all. A ton of traffic congestion is caused by people making suboptimal decisions in traffic. Blocking intersections, not merging properly, stooping and going instead of coasting at a set speed, etc. really reduce the speed of traffic.

If you created a self driving only traffic system that guided the cars in an optimal path and speed you could increase traffic throughput by a lot.

But the current generation of self driving cars aren't even close to that task. If anything they will clog traffic even more when they panic and stop in the middle of traffic. That prevents accidents but it also will clog streets during rush hour.

But eventually they may solve traffic jams.

Re:Los Angeles and the 'great American streetcar scandal' by ConroyBumpus on Monday April 25, 2016 @03:14PM (#11566560)
I just got a wicked case of the heebie-jeebies thinking about the automotive equivalent of CSMA/CD.
Re:Los Angeles and the 'great American streetcar scandal' by thedaemon on Monday April 25, 2016 @03:09PM (#11566514)
Not sure why are are getting down voted as you are correct that people making sub-optimal decisions while driving in traffic. I remember watching a video of people driving in a circle and how bad mistakes trickle back to the end of the traffic.
Re:Los Angeles and the 'great American streetcar scandal' by thedaemon on Friday April 29, 2016 @01:55PM (#11597434)
Please see today's article on HackerNews front page: http://www.bbc.com/autos/story/20160428-how-ai-will-solve-tr...