Re:Parking Bombs: Destroying Downtowns for Cars
by nostrademons on Sunday February 28, 2010 @02:13AM
(#1156597)
I wish more cities would build connecting mass transit/parking garages on the outskirts of the city. When I live in Boston, I used to drive into Alewife all the time and then take the Red Line into Cambridge or downtown. Now that I'm in the Bay Area, I'll usually park at Daly City and then BART in when I have an occasion to go into the city.
Now if only BART covered more than that narrow corridor near downtown...
Re:Parking Bombs: Destroying Downtowns for Cars
by AlecM on Sunday February 28, 2010 @04:04AM
(#1156669)
Some major cities still lack adequate public transportation, like Seattle and Los Angeles. I live in the latter, about 10 miles from downtown due to cost (about $600-$700 cheaper on rent) and I have to drive in because public transportation would include taking light rail to subway to bus and tack on an extra hour to my commute and cost literally hundreds a month. Far cheaper and faster to drive, even with the abysmal LA traffic.
Re:Parking Bombs: Destroying Downtowns for Cars
by jrockway on Sunday February 28, 2010 @04:19AM
(#1156684)
I've been to Seattle and didn't see any problem with the public transportation. Those buses with trolley poles are cool!
(The reality is that not every city has the population and demand to have a Tokyo-like subway system. Sometimes, buses are enough.)
Re:Parking Bombs: Destroying Downtowns for Cars
by fortes on Sunday February 28, 2010 @05:24PM
(#1157575)
I lived in Seattle for 6 years, 2 of which were completely car free. It's possible, but you're swimming upstream. I'm now in NYC, and it is far easier.
Re:Parking Bombs: Destroying Downtowns for Cars
by akgerber on Sunday February 28, 2010 @09:13AM
(#1156901)
If it's within three miles or so on each end, you could also try riding a folding bike to and from the train station.
Re:Parking Bombs: Destroying Downtowns for Cars
by gregwebs on Sunday February 28, 2010 @01:34AM
(#1156570)
> Now if only the roads could be moved underground and replaced with parks (and a bicycle path); that would be really nice.
That was the Big Dig in Boston- it worked, but it was really expensive.
Re:Parking Bombs: Destroying Downtowns for Cars
by jrockway on Sunday February 28, 2010 @01:35AM
(#1156572)
I mean the surface streets. Although you would have to call them something else after moving them below the surface :)
Re:Parking Bombs: Destroying Downtowns for Cars
by gaius on Sunday February 28, 2010 @06:05AM
(#1156737)
Woulda been cheaper to raise the city!
Re:Parking Bombs: Destroying Downtowns for Cars
by spc476 on Sunday February 28, 2010 @04:24AM
(#1156687)
IF you can build underground. Here in South Florida, going down isn't a good idea, unless you like the idea of a personal sub for commuting purposes.
I am, however, seeing more parking garages being used down here.
Re:Parking Bombs: Destroying Downtowns for Cars
by elai on Sunday February 28, 2010 @04:40AM
(#1156694)
It doesn't necessarily have to be under ground.
Re:Parking Bombs: Destroying Downtowns for Cars
by enf on Sunday February 28, 2010 @02:08PM
(#1157293)
Parking within buildings is still lousy because it is very hard to build buildings that have the necessary doors and ramps for car access and still have any space left over for an active-use ground floor. Without active uses at sidewalk level, the streets are dead and you might as well drive everywhere anyway.
Re:Parking Bombs: Destroying Downtowns for Cars
by illumin8 on Sunday February 28, 2010 @03:53PM
(#1157445)
This isn't that hard to do. Many of the new condo and coop buildings in NY suburbs have a simple driveway that leads down a ramp to the parking garage (below ground). The ground floor is used for retail space like a coffee shop or deli, floors 2-X are used for condos, and all parking is underground.
This seems to be the best of all worlds -- the parking doesn't take anything away, it just makes the buildings 5 stories taller. Why anyone would drive their car in a major city, though, is beyond me.
Now if only the roads could be moved underground and replaced with parks (and a bicycle path); that would be really nice.