Re:Seattle vigilante reuniting stolen bikes with their owners
by na85 on Sunday April 24, 2016 @02:06PM
(#11560657)
What's stopping people from filing the serial numbers off?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Seattle vigilante reuniting stolen bikes with their owners
by usrusr on Sunday April 24, 2016 @02:14PM
(#11560679)
Because potential buyers would instantly know that they are buying stolen goods. People who would be fine with that might just as easily steal a bike for themselves, making the definitely-stolen-bike market a really weak one.
Re:Seattle vigilante reuniting stolen bikes with their owners
by hueving on Sunday April 24, 2016 @03:00PM
(#11560857)
>People who would be fine with that might just as easily steal a bike for themselves
This isn't true. I know several people that don't care much about buying things with a shady history but would never steal anything themselves. The logic was something like, "Would you still accept a $20 bill if it had been stolen at some point since it was printed?"
Re:Seattle vigilante reuniting stolen bikes with their owners
by striking on Sunday April 24, 2016 @03:38PM
(#11561012)
That wouldn't hold up in court :)
If they could prove you knew or suspected it might have been stolen, you can get charged (depending on your state's laws).
Re:Seattle vigilante reuniting stolen bikes with their owners
by maaaats on Sunday April 24, 2016 @02:14PM
(#11560682)
I, for one, would not buy a bike with that filed off, because of the implication (and the fact that buying goods one could be expected to know is stolen is illegal). So that's that
Re:Seattle vigilante reuniting stolen bikes with their owners
by danieltiIlett on Monday April 25, 2016 @03:18AM
(#11562884)
It's inferior compared to welding a new bead over the serial, grinding it flat and engraving a new serial?