Re:Concerned about veteran with PTSD, judge serves time with...
by civilian on Friday April 22, 2016 @03:55PM
(#11552149)
It's because he's better at empathy than us. :)
Re:Concerned about veteran with PTSD, judge serves time with...
by pessimizer on Friday April 22, 2016 @04:03PM
(#11552198)
Your argument is with English, not me.
Re:Concerned about veteran with PTSD, judge serves time with...
by saalweachter on Friday April 22, 2016 @06:59PM
(#11553115)
Our argument is with your specific views on the meaning of words.
Other sources[1] define empathy as "feeling what another person feels" and sympathy as "having compassion for a person without necessarily feeling what they feel". In that case, the judge is clearly empathizing with the defendant, and not merely sympathizing.
Re:Concerned about veteran with PTSD, judge serves time with...
by derrida on Friday April 22, 2016 @05:23PM
(#11552647)
Can you see any dramatic irony here?
People use words in a variety of ways - communication: a search for a language that is also yours!
Re:Concerned about veteran with PTSD, judge serves time with...
by tlrobinson on Friday April 22, 2016 @05:24PM
(#11552655)
Their username may contain a hint...
Re:Concerned about veteran with PTSD, judge serves time with...
by pessimizer on Friday April 22, 2016 @03:57PM
(#11552165)
Ascribing my disagreement to "combativeness" is both combative and presumptive. I've said exactly what I meant, and why.
Re:Concerned about veteran with PTSD, judge serves time with...
by abiox on Friday April 22, 2016 @07:44PM
(#11553333)
is the act of describing something as combative itself a combative thing?
Re:Concerned about veteran with PTSD, judge serves time with...
by pessimizer on Friday April 22, 2016 @10:05PM
(#11553780)
It is.
Why are you being so combative?