News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:San Francisco Is Requiring Solar Panels on All New Buildings by bmelton on Friday April 22, 2016 @01:58PM (#11551079)
Sure, and that's a fair point, but perhaps those humans shouldn't have the authority to impose their whimsies on the entirety of their neighbors because they think it's a good idea.
Re:San Francisco Is Requiring Solar Panels on All New Buildings by eldavido on Friday April 22, 2016 @02:24PM (#11551365)
You know, I used to be a hardcore libertarian, but I've reconsidered a bit.

The density of cities like Manhattan/SF mean you have to have some level of regulation above and beyond what makes sense when everyone has an acre of his own land, to do with what we chooses. Whether it's noise, pollution, traffic safety, fire codes, etc., I think giving up a little bit more freedom than you would living on, say, a farm, is the price of living in a place with so much jammed in to so little space.

Maybe something to think about, if you take umbrage with people "imposing their whimsies" (I'm not being sarcastic, I really think about this a lot). Austin is nice, but it's a car-city. Show me one walkable city without the petty tyranny of city government and I'd move there pretty quickly.

Re:San Francisco Is Requiring Solar Panels on All New Buildings by bmelton on Friday April 22, 2016 @02:43PM (#11551543)
I'm kind of a hybrid, really. I consider myself a libertarian at times, but mostly, a constitutionalist. I find that I object to most of the laws passed federally, but don't mind them so much when they're passed at the level of a municipality, city or even state (y'know, 10th amendment). In short, I don't believe in one-size-fits-all policies, as while I think a $15 minimum wage might work wonderfully in places like San Francisco, or NYC, I think they'd be disastrous in places like Alaska, or Arkansas. Regardless, much of the legislation I see being passed in places like San Francisco are fairly arbitrary, and that's the sort of thing I was responding to in the grand-parent.

For what it's worth, I tend to think less of these impositions as tyranny because, specifically, if I don't like what's going on in San Francisco, I can move to Austin.

Re:San Francisco Is Requiring Solar Panels on All New Buildings by stoic on Friday April 22, 2016 @04:56PM (#11552505)
We've got a bag ban here, too. ;)
Re:San Francisco Is Requiring Solar Panels on All New Buildings by dragontamer on Friday April 22, 2016 @01:59PM (#11551090)
Maybe their neighbors should work on electing better humans.

Someone needs to write the laws. Laws need to be updated over time, as society changes and our values change.

Re:San Francisco Is Requiring Solar Panels on All New Buildings by swombat on Friday April 22, 2016 @02:00PM (#11551098)
Completely agree. I don't believe authoritarian dictates are a way to achieve good aims in this century. And yet we must live with this type of organisation, for now, because we are still developing the alternatives...