News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Protocol for Dying by adaml_623 on Friday April 22, 2016 @08:14AM (#11548529)
Well I'm sure you'll be down-voted but in case you come back to check the replies I'll just say I'm sorry that you can't accept the world at the moment.

Unless the singularity happens really soon and someone bootstraps a benign godlike AI to take us under it's wing I think we're stuck with a very high (five 9s ?) probability of dying.

It's fine to rail against it but sometimes you have to accept that you were born in the dark ages and life is short.

Re:A Protocol for Dying by TeMPOraL on Friday April 22, 2016 @08:19AM (#11548544)
It's not either/or. We could accept that and fight it, so that our children, or our children's children won't have to die anymore.
Re:A Protocol for Dying by anonymous777 on Friday April 22, 2016 @08:28AM (#11548594)
I can accept the world. I have 2 relatives already dead, though I'm not very emotional about it.

I just want to emphasize that this is the world we have built with our own hands. It's not the worst world possible, but we can do better than that.

>Unless the singularity happens I think S-word in mostly a meme. You can apply ML to biological problems right now. You don't need strong AI for it (though ofc even subhuman general ai would be of great help to science, if you look at deepmind's interview that's exactly their goal)

>I think we're stuck with a very high (five 9s ?) probability of dying. It depends on our own actions as well. At least one could opt for cryo, ofc it isn't a guarantee of anything but still it's a chance.

You may think I'm talking like a futurist or a transhumanist, but in fact I'm just an ordinary technical person trying to be realistic (and disliking involuntary death). If our western culture really values human life as much as declared, then we as a society should focus more on increasing quality of life and longevity, instead of exploiting each other for profit.