News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Kite: Thoughts on Security by LeifCarrotson on Thursday April 21, 2016 @04:42PM (#11545196)
Why does the device need to be on-premise? Would a Github Enterprise-like setup, where you have a dedicated Kite instance/VPS at their datacenter, work for you?
Re:Kite: Thoughts on Security by fweespee_ch on Thursday April 21, 2016 @04:45PM (#11545217)
Contractual agreements, NDAs, etc. might make it impossible to disclose work product and/or source code to a 3rd party which would include Kite.

> If you're a contract developer, or a developer working full-time for a consulting firm, you might not have the authority to determine for yourself whether it's contractually allowable to upload code to Kite's servers. But if you're working for a pro shop, you can bet every dollar in your pocket that the contracts your firm has with its clients technically prohibit it.

As tptacek said, you might be prohibited and/or not have the authority to do so.

> Why does the device need to be on-premise? Would a Github Enterprise-like setup, where you have a dedicated Kite instance/VPS at their datacenter, work for you?

We run GitLab on-premise so I'm not familiar enough to answer. However, if by "their" you mean Kite? Yeah, that won't work as its essentially the same thing. [e.g. Disclosing it to a 3rd party outside of my control]

Re:Kite: Thoughts on Security by simonw on Thursday April 21, 2016 @05:08PM (#11545362)
GitHub Enterprise allows you to run a dedicated instance on a virtual machine in your own datacenter, which lets you keeps all of your stuff behind your own firewall.