News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:PyPy 5.1 released by poooogles on Thursday April 21, 2016 @12:36PM (#11543408)
>The reason Python 3 is on the back burner is that there simply isn't a large enough audience right now.

Funnily enough the reason I haven't adopted using PyPy is down to their lack of Python3 support. I think you're underestimating the amount of people using Python3.

Re:PyPy 5.1 released by coldtea on Thursday April 21, 2016 @01:02PM (#11543633)
Pip statistics tells us they're not that many.
Re:PyPy 5.1 released by collinmanderson on Friday April 22, 2016 @01:44PM (#11550949)
Do you have any recent statistics?

I'm guessing that most people who use Python 3 are using recent versions of pip that have caching built in, so that may skew the results a bit.

Re:PyPy 5.1 released by coldtea on Friday April 22, 2016 @03:27PM (#11551950)
From this (last year), Python 2.6 is bigger than 3:

https://caremad.io/2015/04/a-year-of-pypi-downloads/

>I'm guessing that most people who use Python 3 are using recent versions of pip that have caching built in, so that may skew the results a bit.

Since pip updates itself too, why wouldn't people using Python 2 also have newer versions?

Re:PyPy 5.1 released by collinmanderson on Saturday April 23, 2016 @08:58AM (#11555360)
I'm guessing a lot of people who are stuck on Python 2.6 are also stuck on old versions of pip.
Re:PyPy 5.1 released by cglace on Thursday April 21, 2016 @12:42PM (#11543461)
I think he means not enough companies willing to sponsor python 3 support.