Re:I Am Alex St. John’s Daughter, and He Is Wrong About Wome...
by stephengillie on Thursday April 21, 2016 @12:01PM
(#11543142)
I've seen someone put this into action, and open communications with his subordinates' wives. Instead of getting mad at her husband for being paged in the middle of the night, or having to work weird hours, she can angrily text the boss directly.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:I Am Alex St. John’s Daughter, and He Is Wrong About Wome...
by sridca on Thursday April 21, 2016 @12:07PM
(#11543191)
That's interesting. But how does it help the wife to directly interact with her husband's boss?
Re:I Am Alex St. John’s Daughter, and He Is Wrong About Wome...
by Lawtonfogle on Thursday April 21, 2016 @12:22PM
(#11543309)
Wouldn't the benefit be for the employee whose spouse can direct anger not at the employee but their manager? The benefit would thus be employees being less likely to have to choose between their relation or their job.
Re:I Am Alex St. John’s Daughter, and He Is Wrong About Wome...
by sridca on Thursday April 21, 2016 @01:44PM
(#11543956)
If I was the husband, I'd rather prioritize being able to swiftly handle my wife's aggressions over brushing off such an intimate challenge for the sake of an employer (who instead gets to do the said challenge).
Anyhow - the purported direct benefit, according to Alex St. John, is for "the wife or GF" as the whole point is to make her happy (from the linked presentation: "If the wife or GF is unhappy the engineer is gone").
Hence, my question: how does it help the wife to directly interact with her husband's boss? Put differently, what is it about directly interacting with her husband's boss that makes her happier than directly interacting with her husband?