News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Born for it – How the image of software developers came a... by coffeandcode on Thursday April 21, 2016 @10:00AM (#11542172)
"some shadowy powers carefully select to make a mysoginistic getto to keep women at bay."

While some may claim this, it is not stated in the article at all and I don't think this is a mainstream opinion. Also the article actually gave detail about this shift in targeting with the SDC recruiting procedure - and it is clear it was about optimising the work environment - and not to exclude women. This also coincided with the rise of the PC which was targeted at boys - again because they thought they would increase their profits, not because they don't like girls messing with the boy hobbies (it even sounds ridiculous). As I mentioned in my first comment, what we have as a result is not everyone gets equal exposure to computers in similar conditions based on their gender and hence fewer women end up interested in the field.

Re:Born for it – How the image of software developers came a... by blah5432 on Thursday April 21, 2016 @12:02PM (#11543155)
The "detail" is so vague as to not deserve that name. Give me a ten minutes description of the described environment and I will give you a dozen alternative explanation to the especulation presented in the article.

This is no more than coach psicology.