News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Big Case of Oops by tptacek on Friday February 26, 2010 @02:25PM (#1153898)
I don't like the term "buffer overflow" because things haven't been that simple since the '90s (the recent Aurora kerfluffle happened because IE freed memory in the wrong order, no overrun involved). But yes, the point is you're trading a problem in a domain where we know how to mitigate problems for a maybe less likely problem in a domain where we have no idea how to mitigate problems.
Re:A Big Case of Oops by euccastro on Friday February 26, 2010 @03:07PM (#1153990)
Is there any reason why sql databases should be less vulnerable to that other type of problems?
Re:A Big Case of Oops by tptacek on Friday February 26, 2010 @03:38PM (#1154050)
Yes: because they've been tested extensively for over a decade for them, especially over the attack vectors exposed on web applications.