Re:EU hits Google with second antitrust charge
by mjevans on Wednesday April 20, 2016 @04:50PM
(#11537650)
As a form of consumer protection I can see why that is desirable.
I think if a company wanted to create a strong branding, for which it would be known that the experience is distinctly NOT android (even if it's based on android) then that is more acceptable.
'Android phone' implies that the google play store and apps are on the device.
I think if a company wanted to create a strong branding, for which it would be known that the experience is distinctly NOT android (even if it's based on android) then that is more acceptable.
'Android phone' implies that the google play store and apps are on the device.