News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Hamilton to stay on $10; Tubman replacing Jackson by logfromblammo on Wednesday April 20, 2016 @01:47PM (#11536238)
I find all representations of identifiable historic individuals to be in poor taste.

I liked it when Liberty herself was featured on the coinage. I'd vastly prefer it if the currency denominations featured various depictions of Industry, Agriculture, Liberty, Justice, and Science/Truth rather than politicians and/or revised and sanitized historic figures. The other side can feature economically significant animals.

Besides that, the money portraits seem a lot like icons of the Americanist pseudoreligion (as satirized to great effect in Bioshock Infinite), and a betrayal of the idea that the US is a nation of laws, not men.

For instance, a Saturn V rocket is a suitable subject for a money engraving. A portrait of Neil Armstrong is not. A Model T is an acceptable subject. Henry Ford is not. A Texas oilfield is suitable. John D. Rockefeller is not. A railway locomotive is okay. Cornelius Vanderbilt is not. The light bulb is acceptable; Thomas Edison is not. A harvester in a productive wheat field is acceptable. The politician that penned the farm bill is not. Blindfolded Justice, with scales in one hand, and sword and laurels in the other, would be great. John Jay would not be.

Real people all come with baggage. Ideals are clean.

Re:Hamilton to stay on $10; Tubman replacing Jackson by davegauer on Wednesday April 20, 2016 @04:33PM (#11537510)
I heartily applaud the idea of a bill bearing the image of a Saturn V rocket.
Re:Hamilton to stay on $10; Tubman replacing Jackson by logfromblammo on Thursday April 21, 2016 @09:35AM (#11541969)
We did get the moon landing on the reverse of an Eisenhower cupronickel dollar coin, so there is precedent for Apollo on money.

I'd also love to see Chicago Pile-1 (first supercritical fission reactor) at Stagg Field on money.