News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Cisco’s Attempt to Dodge Responsibility for Facilitating ... by MichaelGG on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @05:42PM (#11530702)
Just that it seems odd that the US would prosecute entirely legal actions in other countries, especially when they're guilty of similar things as well.

Edit: I apologize, I'm incorrect in this entire thread and didn't understand how this was happening. My fault for not reading and thinking it was the US filling charges.

Though perhaps China can just claim Falun Gong is a terrorist group and Cisco should be in the clear then. In the end, helping governments go after dangerous cults seems like something that should be legal.

Re:Cisco’s Attempt to Dodge Responsibility for Facilitating ... by djrogers on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @06:57PM (#11531144)
The US isn't prosecuting anything or anyone here - as has been pointed out multiple times, this is a civil case brought against Cisco in the US.
Re:Cisco’s Attempt to Dodge Responsibility for Facilitating ... by oldmanjay on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @06:35PM (#11531023)
If you characterize the situation correctly your opinion would seem less reactionary.