Re:Intel to Cut 12,000 Jobs, Forecast Misses Amid PC Blight
by bwhitty on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @04:27PM
(#11530059)
Not trying to be condescending, but legitimately not much. Anecdotes don't really help us here.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Intel to Cut 12,000 Jobs, Forecast Misses Amid PC Blight
by ranci on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @05:04PM
(#11530407)
Jobs created: "Yay! The economy is growing! The economy created xxx,xxx jobs last month! This is a great sign!"
Jobs destroyed: "This can't be a sign of anything. Anecdotes don't help us."
Re:Intel to Cut 12,000 Jobs, Forecast Misses Amid PC Blight
by ahlatimer on Wednesday April 20, 2016 @01:02AM
(#11532360)
You're comparing things across different levels. You have something at a macro level in one (jobs created across the economy) and at a micro level in the other (jobs destroyed at a single company). The economy as a whole might still net create jobs even with Intel laying off 11% of its workforce. Likewise, you can have the labor market across the economy shrinking while other companies are ramping up hiring. A single data point does not indicate a trend.
Re:Intel to Cut 12,000 Jobs, Forecast Misses Amid PC Blight
by sillysaurus3 on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @04:31PM
(#11530098)
I probably should've realized it was a rhetorical question.