Re:Clojure, the Good Parts
by ddellacosta on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @01:41PM
(#11528676)
Totally understood re: timbre and not being a part of the problem of the Java logging ecosystem. I'll play with it again next time I have a chance and see if the interop lib can't solve some of the issues I had before.
Yeah, the post you folks put out on core.typed last fall (https://circleci.com/blog/why-were-no-longer-using-core-type...) was certainly disappointing but not unexpected...I'm curious to see if Jaunt goes anywhere at this point too: https://www.arrdem.com/2016/02/22/clojarr_-_a_friendly_cloju...
Anyways, thanks for the piece!
Can you ELIAJPWKVLAC* why Timbre is so much better than, say, Logback? I imagine not having to write XML configuration is one thing, but what else?
* Explain Like I'm A Java Programmer Who Knows Very Little About Clojure
I agree knowledge of how Java logging works is still useful, but I'm not willing to be part of the problem anymore :-)
Agreed on Schema, and how it illustrates deficiencies in the type system. I still want core.typed, or something like it, but it's too immature for production use.