Re:Solar is now cheaper than some coal, says India energy mi...
by hnarn on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @03:33AM
(#11525413)
The best location for covering a large area of land for purposes of solar energy would arguably be a desert. "90% of the world’s population lives within range of a desert and could be supplied with solar electricity from there", says this article, which also shows you how much needs to be covered to supply the entire globe in theory: http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/22/half-a-trillion-dollars-...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Solar is now cheaper than some coal, says India energy mi...
by xaldir on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @04:17AM
(#11525564)
No it's not.
Solar panels must be free from dust to remain efficient, meaning you have to clean them, frequently, with water...
Re:Solar is now cheaper than some coal, says India energy mi...
by Intermernet on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @06:42AM
(#11526050)
There are patents regarding ultrasonic cleaning of panels[1]. Not sure about actual products yet.
Re:Solar is now cheaper than some coal, says India energy mi...
by u_me_him on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @09:42AM
(#11526828)
There is some type of coating that doesn't allow anything to stick to it. That is a start. I think is called enduroshield. It is not a permanent solution because it wears down but it would help.
Re:Solar is now cheaper than some coal, says India energy mi...
by levemi on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @10:47AM
(#11527341)
The desert is full of life that would be impacted by these panels.
Re:Solar is now cheaper than some coal, says India energy mi...
by SideburnsOfDoom on Wednesday April 20, 2016 @06:02AM
(#11533280)
As compared to the environmental impact of coal, oil and gas, really? Are you joking?