As already pointed out, but perhaps not so clearly, it is neither profound nor accurate due to misattribution. The OP attributes faults of human beings and their actions to software and tech, when software and tech are clearly not necessarily at fault for such, even if they might be found to facilitate those behaviors.
> I'm not anti-tech, but certainly appreciate what the OP has observed.
I'm glad you can appreciate it, but I'm still at a loss how anything of this kind can make much sense beyond a debilitating neuro-degenerative disorder. The OP would be better of seeking remedial assistance through technologies like trans-cranial direct current stimulation.
I'm sure that a solution exists that might be even simpler than tDCS. A walk through the woods always helps me ;)
Since most problems are solved by first recognizing a problem exists, why is the OP's grasp not profound or accurate?
> If you really wanted to pursue tech, you'd be a positive force in it rather than trying to pigeonhole tech/software for ever-present human foibles. It would make more sense to be a part of the evolution of technology
Unfortunately, being a positive force doesn't always change the direction of things if the momentum and direction is toward a wall or cliff.
I'm not anti-tech, but certainly appreciate what the OP has observed.