News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why I am betting on Julia (2014) by sghodas on Sunday April 17, 2016 @06:41PM (#11516686)
The 1-indexed arrays can sometimes be nice, but I've run into bugs so many times when translating the code into a language with 0-indexed arrays.
Re:Why I am betting on Julia (2014) by tptacek on Sunday April 17, 2016 @06:48PM (#11516708)
That's interesting, because the 1-indexed arrays are primary the primary reason I don't ever seriously consider using Julia (or Lua); I can only shudder and imagine the obnoxious number of off-by-one mistakes I'd make.
Re:Why I am betting on Julia (2014) by simonster on Sunday April 17, 2016 @09:20PM (#11517169)
If I can switch between programming languages that use 0-based and 1-based indexing without getting confused, surely you could too. If you don't think that learning to use 1-based indexing is worth it, that's fair enough, but it's pretty low on my list of things that give me trouble when I translate code between languages.
Re:Why I am betting on Julia (2014) by jernfrost on Sunday April 17, 2016 @06:57PM (#11516731)
I think this is a mental block people have. I grew up on zero based arrays in C, but I can't say this has caused me any issues thus far using Julia.

I don't know how it is for others but for me I just into this mode where I think about Julia as doing math and I know in math you start at 1 for vectors and matrices.

Besides the way functions and APIs work, you seldom have to write code that really depends on the start index.

Re:Why I am betting on Julia (2014) by CyberDildonics on Sunday April 17, 2016 @06:59PM (#11516742)
What you are saying is conjecture if you haven't tried Julia or Lua. The reality is that 1 based indexing is trivial compared to the difficulties of a complex program.
Re:Why I am betting on Julia (2014) by Avshalom on Sunday April 17, 2016 @09:01PM (#11517123)
On the other hand having cut my teeth programming in MATLAB and lua 1-based indexing is on of the things that endears Julia to me.
Re:Why I am betting on Julia (2014) by matt4077 on Sunday April 17, 2016 @08:58PM (#11517118)
Yeah, it just feels wrong. Of course that's just habit and in fact starting counts at 1 is actually the more user-centric way of doing it.

I wish I could get used to Julia but for some reason I just think the source looks..ugly. Maybe it's my dark past with php that makes me shudder at the sight of avg(x) (instead of x.avg).

I know that's stupid (and the syntax is actually required for multiple dispatch). Maybe Julia and I should try couples' therapy.

Re:Why I am betting on Julia (2014) by jhbadger on Monday April 18, 2016 @01:55PM (#11521835)
Basically every mathematical/data science language uses 1-based arrays -- R, MATLAB, and Mathematica in addition to Julia. Probably because traditionally (and to a degree even now) the standard numerical language was FORTRAN.
Re:Why I am betting on Julia (2014) by ced on Sunday April 17, 2016 @07:23PM (#11516828)
Out of curiosity, assuming that Julia magically had 0-indexed arrays, what would you use it for?