Re:Drone hits British Airways plane approaching Heathrow Air...
by Avshalom on Sunday April 17, 2016 @05:56PM
(#11516513)
I think right now the idea is generally a bigger faster one with a net.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Drone hits British Airways plane approaching Heathrow Air...
by arjie on Sunday April 17, 2016 @06:08PM
(#11516560)
That's a clever one. More importantly, it makes for an amusing picture.
Re:Drone hits British Airways plane approaching Heathrow Air...
by kaybe on Sunday April 17, 2016 @07:44PM
(#11516896)
Not as cool as hunting birds though, which is being tried too. Drones are probably more practical, I guess.
Re:Drone hits British Airways plane approaching Heathrow Air...
by Piskvorrr on Monday April 18, 2016 @06:56AM
(#11518919)
Now you have two problems, as in "Engine 1 ate the drone, while Engine 2 ate the eagle."
Re:Drone hits British Airways plane approaching Heathrow Air...
by etherael on Sunday April 17, 2016 @10:00PM
(#11517282)
I've seen that, but wouldn't a laser actually be more reliable / faster?
Re:Drone hits British Airways plane approaching Heathrow Air...
by Avshalom on Sunday April 17, 2016 @10:26PM
(#11517383)
Well like arjie said, you don't really want flying debris near people/runways
Re:Drone hits British Airways plane approaching Heathrow Air...
by etherael on Monday April 18, 2016 @02:28AM
(#11518041)
And maybe the energy necessary to actually vaporise entirely would not be the kind of thing one would be wanting to punch up into the atmosphere willy nilly.
Re:Drone hits British Airways plane approaching Heathrow Air...
by Piskvorrr on Monday April 18, 2016 @07:13AM
(#11518981)
Not to mention that you actually need an actual cannon, not a pointer. http://www.defense-aerospace.com/articles-view/feature/5/159... Yup, that's definitely something you want to mess with around an airport. "Wait, I was supposed to shoot down that other blip?"