Re:In Cramped and Costly Bay Area, Cries to Build, Baby, Build
by repsilat on Saturday April 16, 2016 @06:26PM
(#11512555)
Downtown Auckland, 2005/6. There was a big increase in the number of small apartments available. Prices did fall, and people I know "lost money" because of it. It was still a great thing for the city.
Auckland itself is growing quickly, and the price of houses is (like in many other places) outrageous. Apartment rents are still relatively sane, though.
Re:In Cramped and Costly Bay Area, Cries to Build, Baby, Build
by Decade on Saturday April 16, 2016 @09:24PM
(#11513074)
Well, from the last discussion where Sonja participated:
Philadelphia, additional housing, plus market crash. It doesn’t say that prices on existing housing went down, but the new “luxury” housing did not sell for close to the expected luxury prices.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10370964
http://grist.org/cities/urban-activists-set-out-to-sue-san-f...
Re:In Cramped and Costly Bay Area, Cries to Build, Baby, Build
by cynicalkane on Saturday April 16, 2016 @07:44PM
(#11512836)
Generally, people don't build housing supply with the intent of oversaturating the market and losing money!
And you've hit on one of the reasons: the investors who want in want into a market where real estate commands the prices it does.