Global Task Exchange Protocol

Re:Global Task Exchange Protocol by epaulson on Saturday April 16, 2016 @02:14PM (#11511637)

I'd follow along with what the IndieWeb folks are doing. They've got a pretty good principle of reusing existing infrastructure in new ways to build interesting things without needing coordinated upgrades.

As an example, getting widespread adoption of a new TX DNS record type is unlikely, though you can fake it with TXT records.

https://indiewebcamp.com/Category:building-blocks

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Global Task Exchange Protocol by bartbes on Saturday April 16, 2016 @04:07PM (#11512046)

It sounds to me like the OP is actually looking for SRV records, which are basically generalised MX records.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Global Task Exchange Protocol by madospace on Saturday April 16, 2016 @10:08PM (#11513180)

For now TXT records will work, till it becomes a stable one, then it can be moved to either SRV or its own set of records

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Global Task Exchange Protocol by madospace on Saturday April 16, 2016 @02:19PM (#11511658)

> though you can fake it with TXT records.

That is right. I will update the proposal thanks!

Thanks a lot for the suggestion. I love what IndieWeb is doing.

[ Parent | on HN ]