Re:In Cramped and Costly Bay Area, Cries to Build, Baby, Build
by cesarb on Saturday April 16, 2016 @02:06PM
(#11511610)
That would prevent a hazardous factory from being built next to residences, but wouldn't prevent residences being built nearby after the factory is already there. For that, you'd need restrictions on the residences and/or the land.
Re:In Cramped and Costly Bay Area, Cries to Build, Baby, Build
by Tiksi on Saturday April 16, 2016 @02:14PM
(#11511639)
Maybe a hybrid solution would work? Have a zone tied to the factory, no residential buildings within a certain radius of the factory, but if the factory shuts down or moves, the zone goes with it.
It makes more sense to me to place the restrictions on the company/factory than the land itself, and building permits are already used by municipalities to negotiate location, etc.