Re:In Cramped and Costly Bay Area, Cries to Build, Baby, Build
by hodwik2 on Saturday April 16, 2016 @12:34PM
(#11511201)
I can put cameras outside of my home, I can have cars towed away, I can find the ripped up bill in their trash bag that tells me the perpetrator is John Q. Badguy.
But that is neither here nor there. My desire for comfort is nullified when it's being weighted against someone's human rights.
Re:In Cramped and Costly Bay Area, Cries to Build, Baby, Build
by powera on Saturday April 16, 2016 @12:38PM
(#11511219)
Yes you are advocating trespassing and litter. Saying that you'll rent to 8 families and they'll have no choice but to trespass and litter is advocating it. You literally say "I told my [hypothetical] tenants they can just toss their garbage bags over the fence into your yard, and you would take care of it."
Re:In Cramped and Costly Bay Area, Cries to Build, Baby, Build
by Tiksi on Saturday April 16, 2016 @02:03PM
(#11511598)
How many people can live in a building generally isn't even regulated by zoning, it's set by building/fire codes and the certificate of occupancy. Removing the zoning isn't suddenly going to change the legal max occupants/residents of the building.
My tenants don't car about his property, and now he has to figure out which tenant violated his rights?
Yet, all these families now have legal rights and protections to live next door to him.
Call the police? Now you are taking a disproportionate amount of taxpayer resources to protect this specific individual's private property rights.
What if it keeps happening? Assign a special task-force to my specific rental property (the one next-door to the parent poster)?