Re:House Passes Bill to Sabotage Net Neutrality
by greggman on Saturday April 16, 2016 @03:12PM
(#11511849)
It worked amazingly in Japan
Practically overnight (metaphorically) it went from only metered dial up or expensive isdn to ultra fast dsl. There was huge competition mostly lead by SoftBank Japan. The actually handed out routers at subway station exits. Every time their competitors including the old monopoly matched their speed they'd double it. It was awesome to watch
Re:House Passes Bill to Sabotage Net Neutrality
by pavedwalden on Saturday April 16, 2016 @04:40AM
(#11509854)
Why does one provider get a privileged relationship with the maintainer? I'm surprised that in all those industries there was never a complete division of control.
Re:House Passes Bill to Sabotage Net Neutrality
by Nullabillity on Saturday April 16, 2016 @05:25AM
(#11509925)
I used to live in a town with a similar system, which worked great. I suppose the difference was that the maintainer (the municipality power company) was never an ISP themselves.
I'm not well informed enough to know why, but in all cases (cable, railroad, powerlines, ether frequencies) the system devolved into a state where the "provider" linked to the hardware maintainer is the dominant player still.
I'm not syaing it can't work, just that over here it didn't really work.