Re:Gone in Six Characters: Short URLs Considered Harmful for...
by ryanswapp on Friday April 15, 2016 @01:37PM
(#11506172)
Speaking of short urls, am I the only one that refuses to click on them? I hate that I can't see where the link is going to take me.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Gone in Six Characters: Short URLs Considered Harmful for...
by ymse on Friday April 15, 2016 @01:49PM
(#11506271)
I sometimes "curl -I" first to check what it redirects to before clicking. Would love a mobile app that registered as the default app for various URL shorteners and did the same.
Re:Gone in Six Characters: Short URLs Considered Harmful for...
by ryanswapp on Saturday April 16, 2016 @01:26AM
(#11509444)
Nice! I didn't know you could do that.
Re:Gone in Six Characters: Short URLs Considered Harmful for...
by soared on Friday April 15, 2016 @03:25PM
(#11506954)
I've never heard this before. What would be an example of somewhere you don't want to go? I've never clicked a shortened URL and had unexpected results.
Re:Gone in Six Characters: Short URLs Considered Harmful for...
by ryanswapp on Saturday April 16, 2016 @01:25AM
(#11509440)
Most of the time it happens on Twitter. Someone will tweet a bitly link with some enticing headline but I refuse to click it because I don't know where the link is taking me. Perhaps I'm just overly cautious...
Re:Gone in Six Characters: Short URLs Considered Harmful for...
by jessaustin on Saturday April 16, 2016 @11:05AM
(#11510835)
I'm surprised that no one responded to this dubious claim with a link to e.g. goatse...