News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Visual Studio Code 1.0 by Goronmon on Thursday April 14, 2016 @03:02PM (#11499461)
You're making the assumption that vim/emacs are more effective tools.
Re:Visual Studio Code 1.0 by taylodl on Thursday April 14, 2016 @06:02PM (#11500681)
The best possible programming environment is comprised of emacs coupled with a "lispy" language such as Common Lisp, Scheme, Racket or Clojure and the REPL to go along with it.

Nerdvana.

Re:Visual Studio Code 1.0 by TeMPOraL on Thursday April 14, 2016 @06:06PM (#11500710)
And the somewhat sad thing is that this is only a shadow of what was once possible on Lisp Machines... In some areas, we really did make a big step back over the last three decades.
Re:Visual Studio Code 1.0 by krisdol on Thursday April 14, 2016 @03:53PM (#11499830)
You're arguing that stating that water is wet is an assumption
Re:Visual Studio Code 1.0 by imtringued on Thursday April 14, 2016 @04:37PM (#11500139)
If it's so obvious then it should be easy to back up your claim with data.
Re:Visual Studio Code 1.0 by typon on Thursday April 14, 2016 @04:59PM (#11500300)
I highly doubt its even possible to obtain such data. The best you will have is anecdotal claims.

For example, do productive programmers tend to use Vim or is it the other way around? It's hard to find the causality.