Visual Studio Code 1.0

Re:Visual Studio Code 1.0 by anamoulous on Thursday April 14, 2016 @02:47PM (#11499364)

I'm chuckling (not in a bad way!) at the emacs user that prefers vi keybindings expressing optimism about a Microsoft editor written in a statically typed variant of Javascript. Progress is cool.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Visual Studio Code 1.0 by evmar on Thursday April 14, 2016 @04:53PM (#11500252)

I try my hardest to not be dogmatic, and my answer to the argument about vi having better keybindings while emacs having better extensibility is "why not both?" :) JavaScript is almost an acceptable lisp, too...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Visual Studio Code 1.0 by Aldo_MX on Thursday April 14, 2016 @04:17PM (#11500000)

Why? emacs has had an "evil mode" (vi keybindings) for a while

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Visual Studio Code 1.0 by thepiwo on Thursday April 14, 2016 @05:51PM (#11500609)

additionally i would mention that this "Microsoft editor" runs with a web browser engine by google

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Visual Studio Code 1.0 by spdionis on Thursday April 14, 2016 @05:44PM (#11500574)

You made my day. Didn't even notice the irony... :D

[ Parent | on HN ]