News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Atom text editor 1.7.0 released by altano on Wednesday April 13, 2016 @08:25PM (#11493462)
No this is pretty wrong. They are both built on Electron which is just the window shell hosted in Chrome. The actual text editors are completely different code bases that have nothing to do with each other.

The better analogy would be they are both built using Honda doors, but they each have completely different engines.

Re:Atom text editor 1.7.0 released by pyre on Wednesday April 13, 2016 @09:05PM (#11493623)
The point is that if Electron itself (i.e. using Javascript and the DOM) was the issue then both would suffer.
Re:Atom text editor 1.7.0 released by mintplant on Wednesday April 13, 2016 @09:17PM (#11493666)
You might want to tweak the wording a bit - it reads like you're comparing Monaco to Electron, as if it were another app framework based on Chromium.
Re:Atom text editor 1.7.0 released by pyre on Thursday April 14, 2016 @05:59PM (#11500666)
Since both VS Code and Atom use Electron as a base, so if the basic premise of using JavaScript + the DOM to render a code editor / IDE were flawed (i.e. it could never be performant), then both systems would be having issues.

This is what I was trying to state. If performance issues were fundamentally tied to the use of Electron, then you would see that manifest itself in both packages.

Re:Atom text editor 1.7.0 released by mintplant on Thursday April 14, 2016 @06:26PM (#11500801)
Oops, I thought you had written sdesol's comment [1]. Sorry.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11493311