Inky the octopus breaks out of New Zealand aquarium

Re:Inky the octopus breaks out of New Zealand aquarium by wnevets on Wednesday April 13, 2016 @01:43PM (#11490397)

its better than basing it on how cute the animal is.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Inky the octopus breaks out of New Zealand aquarium by icebraining on Wednesday April 13, 2016 @02:05PM (#11490644)

Serious question: why?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Inky the octopus breaks out of New Zealand aquarium by wnevets on Wednesday April 13, 2016 @02:13PM (#11490724)

The higher an animal's intelligence the easier it is for us to emphasize with. Most humans don't like the idea of being eaten alive.

Expanding this idea to machines is very easy. It is ok to treat a machine like a slave that is only capable of moving an object from point a to point b? How about a machine that has a self-aware AI?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Inky the octopus breaks out of New Zealand aquarium by Falling3 on Wednesday April 13, 2016 @02:34PM (#11490940)

Well self-awareness doesn't have a direct correlation with intelligence. I agree that it generally comes down to what/who we can easily empathize with, but I would argue it sentience matters more in that respect (as well as providing a more logical basis for what entities we should actually be concerned about).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Inky the octopus breaks out of New Zealand aquarium by mjevans on Wednesday April 13, 2016 @03:48PM (#11491580)

I believe the moral fault there would be in the creation of a machine with a self-aware AI but a 'body' that is not worthy of that intelligence.

To put that another way; a limited body should have a limited intelligence by design.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Inky the octopus breaks out of New Zealand aquarium by icebraining on Wednesday April 13, 2016 @06:33PM (#11492889)

Assuming that's true, why is it better simply because it's easier to empathize?

[ Parent | on HN ]