Re:Porn site xHamster blocks North Carolina users to protest...
by idiocracy2016 on Tuesday April 12, 2016 @11:18AM
(#11480295)
Sexual exploiters fight for "equality" to sexual exploit just like the local bank robber fights for a no-guns-allowed policy among the bank staff.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Porn site xHamster blocks North Carolina users to protest...
by jmcgough on Tuesday April 12, 2016 @11:37AM
(#11480483)
Pornography doesn't innately require sexual exploitation.
Re:Porn site xHamster blocks North Carolina users to protest...
by liquidzoot on Tuesday April 12, 2016 @12:40PM
(#11481088)
Money is a coercive agent in any situation, and coerced sex acts are rape.
Re:Porn site xHamster blocks North Carolina users to protest...
by jmcgough on Tuesday April 12, 2016 @12:49PM
(#11481183)
Non-consentual sex acts are rape. My ex did porn for years and no aspect of that was non-consentual.
There's also plenty of amateur porn on xHamster.
Re:Porn site xHamster blocks North Carolina users to protest...
by liquidzoot on Tuesday April 12, 2016 @01:41PM
(#11481737)
Yes, and like I said, money makes the consent given questionable at best. Threats of violence can also be used to negate consent. Social pressure applies as well. These factors do not disappear in so called amateur pornography.
Re:Porn site xHamster blocks North Carolina users to protest...
by vectorpush on Tuesday April 12, 2016 @01:23PM
(#11481537)
Do you view prostitution as rape?