Re:Stephen Fry hits out at ‘infantile’ culture of trigger wo...
by DanBC on Tuesday April 12, 2016 @06:05AM
(#11478298)
> In the Tachell incident all that happened was a student decided not to attend an event with Tachell. He was not being censored or "no platformed" in any way.
You're wrong. All of this has already been published, and it was a single click away from the submitted article. The LGBT rep of the Students Union was clearly trying to no-platform Tatchell.
> In the emails, sent to the organisers of a talk at Canterbury Christ Church University on Monday on the topic of “re-radicalising queers”, Cowling refuses an invitation to speak unless Tatchell, who has also been invited, does not attend.
That individual is trying hard to get Tatchell no-platformed. Luckily the SU rejected it.
You're wrong. All of this has already been published, and it was a single click away from the submitted article. The LGBT rep of the Students Union was clearly trying to no-platform Tatchell.
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/feb/13/peter-tatchel...
> In the emails, sent to the organisers of a talk at Canterbury Christ Church University on Monday on the topic of “re-radicalising queers”, Cowling refuses an invitation to speak unless Tatchell, who has also been invited, does not attend.
That individual is trying hard to get Tatchell no-platformed. Luckily the SU rejected it.