Re:Online Dating and the Death of the 'Mixed-Attractiveness'...
by marchenko on Monday April 11, 2016 @11:28AM
(#11472134)
I suspect that men are simply judged on a wider feature set than women. women prefer younger men if judging on aesthetics alone (full head of hair, abdominal definition, clear skin), but place a lower priority on attractiveness and will tolerate signals of aging in men if they are accompanied by signals of wealth/cultivation/accomplishment. Men who are unaccomplished/uninteresting and also older will experience 'pool shrinkage' at a similar rate to women.
Re:Online Dating and the Death of the 'Mixed-Attractiveness'...
by jrnichols on Monday April 11, 2016 @04:25PM
(#11474804)
"Being a 33 year-old man, never married. That's "normal". "
My experience was different. I was called a loser by more women than I could count because I wasn't ever married by then or had kids.
Re:Online Dating and the Death of the 'Mixed-Attractiveness'...
by Jtsummers on Monday April 11, 2016 @06:05PM
(#11475534)
Where is that? I'm in the US for what it's worth and my particular experience is in the southeast.
Mainly the result of societal pressure or expectations. Being a 33 year-old man, never married. That's "normal". If I were a woman, people would be asking me when I was going to get married and have kids (very much depends on area, but this is not at all uncommon). As a 33 year-old man, it's also not thought of as strange for me to date women in their early-to-mid 20s. The same is not true for women my age.
Then there's also just how people tend to rate attractiveness, which is something that really matters in a lot of these online dating systems. Men are generally viewed as (physically) attractive at higher ages than women are. A few wrinkles on a guy, some gray. That makes him "distinguished". You don't here people saying that about women as often.
The age range and feature-sets for what makes women attractive (again, this is emphasizing first impression attraction) are much narrower than for men.